Foreign investment monitor
Issue 7
November 2023
Welcome to our seventh Foreign investment monitor
In this edition, we delve into changing FDI regimes across multiple continents.
Amid ongoing global instability, FDI regulatory regimes continue to change, taking account of post-COVID changes to economies and the developing global political situation, focusing on different types of investors and target sectors.
A recent U.S. Executive Order, when implemented, will impose notification requirements on, and in some cases entirely prohibit, U.S. investments in Chinese companies in sensitive technologies, particularly in the semiconductor and quantum/supercomputing sectors. However, it may not bring about the sweeping “reverse CFIUS” that some policymakers have sought and many in industry have feared.
Canada’s stable economy, natural resources and predictable legal framework make for a desirable destination for foreign investors. However, foreign investments are subject to stringent regulatory oversight, as contributors from our StrongerTogether network explain.
Almost exactly three years after the European Commission’s EU Foreign Direct Investment Screening Regulation entered into force, the Commission has published its Third Annual Report, finding more FDI regimes, fewer cases, and more Phase II proceedings and prohibitions.
Governments in Europe are opting for stricter investment review policies, looking to protect national interests. Belgium and the Netherlands recently introduced a general FDI regime, while Spain has made a number of changes to its existing FDI regime. These developments have potentially significant implications, as we explain with contributions from the authors of the latest Foreign Investment Regulation Review.
In the APAC region, more developed economies have been tightening scrutiny of foreign investments on national security grounds, while economies that are developing have been relaxing restrictions to accelerate economic growth. As our graphic shows, the result is a very broad and sometimes eclectic range of rules, informed by local economic, political and regulatory considerations.
We hope these insights will help provide the knowledge necessary to navigate this complex landscape. But if you would like to discuss any FDI issue in more detail, we would be delighted to arrange a meeting. And let us know if there’s something you'd like to see us cover in the next monitor.
- Introduction
- U.S. Outbound Investment Executive Order focuses on next generation technologies
- Trends and tensions: navigating Canada’s foreign investment regime
- European Commission reports on FDI Screening
- Developments in FDI regimes in Belgium, the Netherlands and Spain
- Foreign investment regimes in APAC at a glance
- Latest edition of Foreign Investment Regulation Review published
- Foreign investment monitor archive
See our articles below
Our team
Please get in touch with us or your usual Freshfields contact if you would like to discuss these or any other regulatory issues in more detail.
Alastair Mordaunt Partner
London, Hong Kong
Aimen Mir Partner | Foreign Investment and National Security | Head of CFIUS Practice
Washington, DC
Dr. Frank Röhling Partner
Berlin
Ignacio Borrego Of Counsel
Madrid
Colin Costello CFIUS and National Security Advisor
Washington, DC
Pascal Cuche Public Law
Paris
Dr. Stephan Denk Partner
Vienna
Dr. Maria Dreher-Lorjé Partner
Vienna, Brussels
Prof. Dr. Juliane Hilf Partner
Düsseldorf
Álvaro Iza Partner
Madrid
Sarah Jensen Counsel
London
Winfred Knibbeler Partner
Amsterdam
Christine Laciak Special Counsel
Washington, DC
Dr. Jérôme Philippe Partner
Paris, Brussels
Alex Potter Partner
London, Brussels
Dr. Uwe Salaschek Counsel
Berlin
Ermelinda Spinelli Partner
Milan, Rome
Paul van den Berg Partner
Amsterdam, Brussels
Dr. Andreas von Bonin Partner
Brussels
Kaori Yamada Partner
Tokyo